X11 mac os x 10.8

Apple Removes X11 in OS X Mountain Lion, Shifts Support to Open Source XQuartz - MacRumors

After the configure I proceed with typing gmake. It doesn't matter.

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service , privacy policy and cookie policy , and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies. Home Questions Tags Users Unanswered. File ".. File not found: I'm using the same configure switches as firefox-x11 from macports, namely: Could you please provide how you compiled it?

Arguments to the configure script and so on? Okay, updated the post. Not what you asked, but as an easy alternative you could install your favorite Linux in VirtualBox and use seamless mode. If you haven't used virtualization, you might be surprised how well it works. The last one in fink is firefox 8 from It runs, but I can't get it to do much of anything on jira. I'm trying to do a similar thing so I don't have to switch between my normal Xbased desktop and firefox all the time. Using the normal OSX firefox isn't difficult, it's just the principle of the thing. Best bet is to run an older version under a virtual machine.

Tony Tellez Tony Tellez 2 6. Not the entire truth. Crap, youa re right, I totally forgot that they added some functionality back in This is not something they'll be fixing. I hope XQuartz manages to do something about it, but there are no guarantees. This is the kind of thing that can become orphanware in a hurry. There was no point in Apple shipping it since we could get the latest version via open source. Only problem here is that Apple is no longer guaranteeing that X11 will work when a new version of the OS ships.

Its possible for OS X to break X11 and the open source XQuartz team to have to quickly produce an update to support new operating system releases.

Navigation menu

Its probably not much of a concern if you wait a couple weeks after the release of a new version of OS X to upgrade. They should have any required updates available to XQuartz within a few weeks or possibly before release of OS X, given the availability of developer previews. Make no mistake. XQuartz doesn't work in its present form on ML. Don't know if I can make it plainer. Is the fact that removing X11 causes various applications to break not a valid concern? Will you be buying me a similar photo editing application so I can work with my photos when Didn't want to quote whole thing to I'll settle for "Mass pwnage to all the haters.

Gee, thanks, Apple, for continuing to not support legacy technologies and destroy people's data and intellectual property. Way to go MacRumors attracts a broad audience of both consumers and professionals interested in the latest technologies and products. We also boast an active community focused on purchasing decisions and technical aspects of the iPhone, iPod, iPad, and Mac platforms.

Start a Discussion

Got a tip for us? Let us know a.

for Mac OS X on Intel (X11 version)

Send us an email b. Anonymous form close x. As noticed by several users running the developer preview version of OS X A popular option for scientists and others seeking to run specialized UNIX software both on local machines and across networks, X11 has been available on OS X for a number of years and has been included as a default install since Mac OS X Leopard. The X Window System has an extensive open source history, with development on the Mac side being handled under the XQuartz project.

Apple's X11 application has been based on this effort, although as with many open source projects bundled for use in commercial software, X11 has generally been somewhat behind the latest XQuartz releases. The current version of X11 is 2. With Mountain Lion, Apple seems to eliminating its dedicated support for the X11 application, instead redirecting users to the open source XQuartz project, which it will continue to support. Top Rated Comments View all. Are you experiencing a specific issue? If so please report a bug. CrossOver does not launch Windows programs correctly, and instead shuts down CrossOver ships their own server and does not actually use anything from Apple's X11 except for quartz-wm.

I suggest you contact Codeweavers for access to test versions of Crossover that will work on Mountain Lion. MacPorts is useless Not just because of X11, but because of changes to Xcode Yeah, there are a few bugs to be worked out As with most updates, MacPorts will need to adjust to this change. We're working on it, and you can follow the thread I started on macports-dev for specific information.

tritinnetleri.gq

Apple Removes X11 in OS X Mountain Lion, Shifts Support to Open Source XQuartz

Please use the latest rc version of XQuartz currently 2. As you probably discovered, earlier versions like 2. That's not true. This is mentioned on the download page and in the installer. What do you mean? The entire startup sequence for XQuartz is based on xinit and startx. If you're having issues, please file bug reports with specific information. About what? File bugs, and they'll get fixed in time.


  1. Step 0: install X11, if need be (first time only).
  2. what program do you need to play avi files on mac.
  3. Front Page Stories.
  4. install two windows on mac.
  5. XQuartz free download for Mac | MacUpdate?

I can't fix bugs I don't know about ; Bingo! You just need to be using the rc versions of XQuartz. File bug reports. You installed the wrong version. Install 2. It is a valid concern.

Please report problems. No, but I will fix bugs if you report them. What they ought to do is release some sort of "Developer Preview" 5 or 6 months ahead of the release of the new OS so that developers heard about these things and had time to produce fixes. Is ML really an update? It seems like a downgrade in many respects.


  • history of apple mac os x!
  • guid partition table on mac.
  • mac address herausfinden windows 7.
  • flac to mp3 mac 2012.
  • recover deleted files mac computer quickly and easily!
  • Stuff like this should really be optional. Not everyone uses it. Do you really know what you're talking about? It seems like you really don't know what you're talking about in many respects. I guess this will be another "dumbing down" thread. Too early to be worried